论文部分内容阅读
目前语法界比较认同将双宾语句分为给予类双宾语句和获取类双宾语句,后者是比较有争议的一类双宾语结构。有学者提出获取类双宾语句源于给予类双宾语句,也有学者并不认同获取类双宾语句的存在,认为获取类双宾语句应属于表领属关系的单宾语句式,于是引发了对“吃了他三个苹果”和“张先生打碎了他四个杯子”这类句子结构的激烈讨论。在这类句子到底是属于双宾语句还是领属义单宾语句的定位问题上一直无法给出明确的界定。本文通过对这类句子结构的文献研究和分析,认同获取类双宾语句是广义的双宾语句下的一个小类,因为语法的动态化而具有单宾语句的特点,它们与表领属关系的单宾语句虽有转换关系,但分别属于双宾语句和单宾语句。
At present, syntactic circles generally agree that the double object sentences are divided into double object sentences and double object sentences, which is a more controversial category of double object structure. Some scholars have proposed that the double-typed sentences should be given to double-like sentences, and some scholars do not agree with the existence of double-typed sentences. It is considered that the double-object sentences should be single-object sentences, “Eaten him three apples ” and “Mr. Zhang broke up his four cups ” This intense discussion of the structure of such sentences. In the end whether this type of sentence belongs to the double-object sentence or the single-object sentence has the meaning of justice has been unable to give a clear definition. By studying and analyzing the literature of this kind of sentence structure, this dissertation holds that a class of double-object sentences is a subclass of generalized double object sentences. Because of the dynamic of the grammar, it has the characteristics of single-object sentences. Although the conversion of single-guest relations, but belong to the double-guest statements and single-guest statements.