刘尧汉同志此文所发表的几个家谱,以及灵台巫画诸项,给南诏史的研究提供一些新材料,是值得我们注意的。不过根据唐以后一直到元朝的汉文史料,南诏是乌蛮的一支,但与唐朝乌蛮中的卢鹿蛮,元朝的罗罗斯是有分别的。所以刘尧汉同志论文的结论我们认为还待进一步的研究,不能即作为定论。 Several genealogies published by Comrade Liu Yaohan in this article, as well as various items of the Lingtai witchcraft, provide some new materials for the study of the history of Nanzhao, which deserves our attention. However, according to the Tang Dynasty after the Han Dynasty until the historical data, Nanzhao is a barbarian one, but with the Tang Dynasty Lu Lu Man Wu Man, the Yuan Dynasty Luo Luosi is different. Therefore, the conclusions of Comrade Liu Yaohan’s thesis we think that further study is needed, which can not be conclusive.