论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比宫颈糜烂的微波与药物治疗效果。方法:宫颈糜烂患者100例根据治疗方法的不同分为微波组50例与药物组50例,微波组采用多功能微波手术治疗仪治疗,药物组采用西瓜霜喷剂治疗。结果:微波组的总有效率为100.0%,药物组为90.0%,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。微波组的宫颈创面愈合时间为21.25±0.36天,而药物组为36.25±3.26天,2组对比差异有统计学意义P<0.05)。结论:相对于药物治疗,宫颈糜烂的微波治疗的疗效值得肯定,且微波治疗能加快宫颈创面愈合,具有较大的发展前景。
Objective: To compare the microwave treatment of cervical erosion and drug treatment. Methods: According to the different treatment methods, 100 cases of cervical erosion patients were divided into microwave group (50 cases) and drug group (50 cases). The microwave group was treated by multi-functional microwave operation instrument and the group treated by watermelon frost spray. Results: The total effective rate was 100.0% in microwave group and 90.0% in drug group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). In the microwave group, the healing time of cervical wounds was 21.25 ± 0.36 days compared with 36.25 ± 3.26 days in the drug group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with medical treatment, the efficacy of microwave treatment of cervical erosion is worthy of recognition, and microwave treatment can speed up the healing of cervical wounds, with great development prospects.