李义海先生一文中对《孔雀东南飞》中焦母寡居提出了质疑,认为“缺少焦母‘丧夫’的证据,只不过是个先验的比附性结论,是用西方理论裁解中华文化的结果。”然而,李先生在论述中在例证方面缺少有力的证据,部分论述过度使用了不严谨的推导,以支持其观点。 In his article, Mr. Li Yihai questioned the geocentric widowhood in “Peacocks Fly to the Southeast”, arguing that “the evidence of the lack of” Shaofu “is nothing more than a priori conclusion of adjuvantism, which uses the Western theory to dispel the Chinese culture Results. ”However, Mr. Lee lacks strong evidence in the case of the argument and partly discusses the overly inaccurate derivation in support of his point of view.