本文梳理了西周早期■诸器中写作“■■”的形体,研究了“■”字,认为它在西周早期纪录“贾”一词,但不是“贾”的本字或初文,也不是《说文》收录的“宁”字,而是一个失传字。它与“宁”的关系只是同形关系,与“贾”的关系只是音假关系。学者将“■■”读为“肈贾”十分正确,是我国先民西周早期从事商贸活动的可靠记录。 This essay combs the characters of writing “■■ ” in the early Western Zhou Dynasty, examines the characters “”, and holds that it records the word “Jia” in the early Western Zhou Dynasty, but not “Jia” The word or the beginning of the article, nor is “said the text” included “Ning” word, but a lost word. Its relationship with “Ning ” is only a homomorphic relationship, and the relationship with “Jia ” is only a relationship between sound and fake. Scholars read “” as “” very correct ", is a reliable record of early business activities of our ancestors in Western Zhou Dynasty.