论文部分内容阅读
从规范意旨看,政府信息公开收费制度本身承担着保障知情权和实现行政成本回收的应有作用。然而,实践中不收费、乱收费等做法的出现在很大程度上导致了收费制度的功能式微和定位偏离,并可能造成恶意申请涌入、行政资源浪费和知情权受损等严重后果。着眼于收费制度的代际发展和未来完善,应当通过立法对其进行修正,具体包括以行政成本为基准明确收费标准、以便民惠民为精神改革收费方式、以充分保障为底限创新减免规则等。
From the perspective of normative intent, the government information public charging system itself has the due role of protecting the right to information and the recovery of administrative costs. However, the practice of non-payment and arbitrary collection of fees has largely led to the functional micro-positioning of the charging system and positioning deviation, and may result in the influx of malicious applications, administrative waste of resources and the consequences of the damage to the right to information. Focusing on the inter-generational development of the charging system and its future improvement, it should be amended through legislation, which includes clarifying the charging standards based on the administrative costs so as to enable the people benefit the people to reform the charging mode for the spirit and the full guarantee as the basis for innovation and exemption rules Wait.