论文部分内容阅读
目的:总结人工流产术中两种方法对早孕年轻未生育妇女镇痛效果。方法:对200例宫颈软化准备下应用丙泊酚(A组)、利多卡因(B组)进行镇痛效果、宫颈松弛、手术时间、出血量、人工流产综合征(RAAS)、不良反应、术后离院时间、医疗费用等进行比较。结果:两组在镇痛效果、手术时间、出血量、不良反应、人工流产综合征等比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在术后离院时间及医疗费用方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两种方法均具有良好的镇痛效果,丙泊酚镇痛效果最优,利多卡因镇痛效果好,是简便、安全、价廉的方法。
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the analgesic effects of two methods on abortion in young pregnant women during first trimester of pregnancy. Methods: 200 cases of cervical softening prepared for propofol (group A), lidocaine (group B) were analgesic effect, cervical relaxation, operation time, bleeding, abortion syndrome (RAAS), adverse reactions, Postoperative hospital stay, medical expenses, etc. were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in analgesic effect, operation time, blood loss, adverse reaction, and induced abortion syndrome between the two groups (P> 0.05), but there were statistically significant differences in postoperative hospitalization time and medical expenses Significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: Both of the two methods have good analgesic effect, propofol has the best analgesic effect and lidocaine has good analgesic effect. It is a simple, safe and inexpensive method.