段文波教授与韩波教授关于当事人主义和辩论主义的两篇论文,脉络清晰层次分明地梳理了这两个重要理论概念的内涵与操作边界,从中我们既可以读到我国民事诉讼法的发展历程,也能够发现我国民事诉讼法学界对基础理论问题已经有了较为充分的共识。因此,对于两文的主要观点,我深表赞同。然而,与理论界的共识一致不同,实务界对于辩论主义和当事人主义依然存在 Professor Duan Wenbo and Professor Han Bo two papers on the parties doctrine and debate doctrine clearly and concisely clarify the connotation and operational boundary of these two important theoretical concepts, from which we can not only read the development process of our country’s civil procedure law, Also can find our country civil procedure jurisprudence has already had the quite sufficient consensus to the basic theory question. Therefore, I strongly agree with the main points of the two papers. However, contrary to the consensus of theorists, the practice community still exists for the debate and the advocacy