论文部分内容阅读
人民法院审查国际商事仲裁案件,是以民事诉讼法规定的审判标准(以下简称诉讼标准)为标准,还是以我国仲裁法、民事诉讼法及有关国际条约规定的标准为标准(以下简称仲裁法等法律规定的标准),这是必须搞清楚的一个重要问题。因为这两个标准差异甚大,依据的标准不同,对仲裁案件的处理就不同,有的甚至可能截然相反。笔者认为,该问题在实然的角度是明确的,根据我国仲裁法、民事诉讼法等法律规定,法院审查国际商事仲裁
People’s courts review international commercial arbitration cases based on the standards set forth in the Civil Procedure Law (hereinafter referred to as litigation standards) or the standards set forth in the Arbitration Law, Civil Procedure Law and relevant international treaties (hereinafter referred to as Arbitration Law, etc.) The standard set by law) is an important issue that must be clarified. Because these two standards vary widely and are based on different standards, the handling of arbitration cases is different, and some may even be the opposite. The author believes that the issue is clear in the actual point of view, according to China’s Arbitration Law, Civil Procedure Law and other legal provisions, the court review of international commercial arbitration