论文部分内容阅读
刘知幾有关史家之文与文士之文、史才与文才的辨析,从史学的角度对文学与史学作了清晰的分割,旨在纠正魏晋以来历史撰述受文学影响而形成的浮华之风,确立文而不丽、质而非野、含蓄隽永的历史叙事风格。萧统从文学特性出发,将记事之史、系年至书摒弃于《文选》之外,划清了文与史的界限,反映了文学的自觉。刘知幾要求清算绮靡文风对历史叙事的影响,则体现了文史分途后史家史学意识的自觉,并从思想观念上确立了史学的独立性。
LIU Zhi-gui Discrimination and analysis of the literary and scholarly writings, literati and literary genius of historians and the clear division of literature and historiography from the perspective of historiography aimed at rectifying the flashy winds of history written by the literature since the Wei and Jin Dynasties , Establish the text rather than Li, quality rather than the wild, subtle Meaningful historical narrative style. Starting from the literary traits, Xiao Tong discarded the history of the memoirs from his collection of books to the outside of “Selected Works of Wen Jiaxuan”, drew a clear line between the literary and the historical, and reflected the consciousness of literature. Liu Zhiji’s desire to clear the influence of the clear style of writing on historical narration reflects the consciousness of historians of historians after the separation of literature and history and establishes the independence of history from the conceptions of thought.