论文部分内容阅读
早期西方法律人类学有关案例分析法的描述与阐释具有明显的知识论缺陷。格拉克曼提倡的扩展案例分析法,克服了传统案例分析法的诸多缺陷。扩展案例分析法强调对案例做扩展情境分析,其渊源可追溯至格拉克曼早年提出的社会情境分析法。由社会情境分析转向扩展案例分析,意味着格拉克曼法律人类学方法论思想的逐步完善。晚年格拉克曼开始对扩展案例分析法自身的局限性进行反思。无论是创设社会情境分析法,还是将其发展为扩展案例分析法,格拉克曼都想去证明部落社会的法律文明与现代工业社会的法律文明之间不存在本质差异。
The description and interpretation of the case analysis method in the early Western legal anthropology have obvious epistemological flaws. Grackman advocated the expansion of case analysis, to overcome the many shortcomings of the traditional case analysis. Extended case analysis emphasizes case analysis of extended scenarios, and its origins can be traced back to the social situational analysis put forward by Grackman in his early years. From social situational analysis to extended case analysis, it means that Grackman’s methodology of legal anthropology gradually improved. In his later years, Grackman began to reflect on the limitations of expanding case studies. Whether it is the creation of social situational analysis or the expansion of case analysis, Grackman wants to prove that there is no essential difference between the legal civilization of tribal society and the legal civilization of modern industrial society.