在前人研究的基础上,通过对英语“have+VP”与汉语“有+VP”对比分析,作者认为英语“have+VP”与汉语“有+VP”虽有相似之处,但在语义和语法方面存在很多不同。语义上,英语“have”和其后动词分词一起表完成,而汉语中,“有”更多是对其后动作现实性的强调。语法上,“have”作为体助动词,其后接动词,用来表肯定、否定、疑问及相应的回答,形式上完全对称;“有”的词性众说纷纭,且在用法、使用频率、对称性上与英文“have”有很大不同。 On the basis of previous researches, the author thinks that English + “have + VP” and Chinese “+ VP” though English “have + VP ” and Chinese “have + VP There are similarities, but there are many differences in terms of semantics and grammar. Semantically, English ”have “ completes with the following verbal participle, whereas in Chinese, ”more “ is more emphasis on the reality of subsequent actions. Syntactically, ”have “ as the auxiliary verbs, followed by verbs, used to table affirmative, negative, doubt and the corresponding answer formally completely symmetrical; ”Have “ part of the different opinions, and in usage, frequency of use Symmetry is quite different from English ”have ".