论文部分内容阅读
最近笔者有幸拜读了狄宠德、陈伯兰同志的《试述档案事业和图书事业在历史上的区别》(以下简称《试述》)一文。此文发表于1981年《档案工作》第3期,1986年被收进王德俊编的(《档案管理学参考资料》(电大教材、档案出版社出版)。笔者对《试述》一文的一些观点实在不敢苟同,觉得有提出商榷讨论之必要,以求共同促进档案学的发展与提高。一讨论档案和图书在历史上的区分,首先要弄清档案和图书各自的定义。否则就会堕入五里烟雾,陷入一团混沌。关于档案的定义,这是档案界多年来一直争论不休的问题。我认为档案是人类在社会话动中形成的具
I recently had the privilege of reading the article entitled “Differentiating the Historical Differences Between Archives and Book Business” (hereinafter referred to as “Trial Discourse”) by Comrade Di Chongde and Chen Bolan. This article was published in the third issue of “Archives Work” in 1981 and was compiled by Wang Dejun in 1986 (“Archives Management Reference Materials” (TV University Press, Archives Publishing House). I do not agree, I think there is the need to discuss the discussion in order to jointly promote the development and improvement of archives. A discussion of archives and books in the history of the distinction, we must first understand the definition of archives and books, or else it will fall Into the smoke of five, plunged into a chaos on the definition of the file, which is archival community has been debated over and over .I think the file is formed in the social words of mankind