论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同给养途径在重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)中的临床效果。方法选择2008年1月2009年4月收治的49例SAP患者,随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组25例采用肠内营养,对照组24例采用全胃肠外营养,比较两组的临床效果。结果两组的并发症发生率、感染率和病死率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组患者的血清白蛋白水平和前白蛋白水平均升高,以观察组升高更明显,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肠内营养应用于SAP患者临床效果满意,值得关注。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of different feeding routes in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods 49 cases of SAP patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2008 to April 2009 were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Twenty-five patients in the observation group received enteral nutrition, 24 patients in the control group received total parenteral nutrition. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of complication, infection and mortality between the two groups (P> 0.05). Serum albumin and prealbumin levels were increased in both groups after treatment More significantly, the differences between groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The clinical results of enteral nutrition for patients with SAP are satisfactory and worth attention.