第三世界近来进行的私有化有两个根源:一是国内的人们相信公共企业的生产没有达到预期的效果;二是在那些依赖国际货币基金组织和世界银行结构调整贷款的国家中,从外部给它们施加了这样一种观点,即认为公共企业所起的是负作用。由于目前都认为既要反对公共企业对生产的完全支配,又要反对完全的自由放任机制,所以关键的问题就是如何在这两者之间划定一条界线。公共企业和私营企业各自做什么才是最好的? The recent privatization in the Third World has two root causes: First, people in the country believe that the production of public enterprises has not achieved the expected results; Second, in countries that rely on the International Monetary Fund and World Bank structural adjustment loans, from the outside To give them a view that public companies are playing a negative role. Since it is currently considered that both companies must oppose the complete control of production by public enterprises, and they must oppose complete laissez-faire, the key issue is how to draw a line between the two. What is the best for public and private companies?