论文部分内容阅读
《人民司法》一九八六年第十期刊登了刘国贞同志《窃取转帐支票骗购物品应定何罪》一文(下称《刘文》),认为被告人蔡胜窃得印鉴齐全的空白转帐支票,去某经销公司批发部骗购一千五百条价值六千八百一十七元五角的香烟,已提取五百条,销赃得款二千一百七十元的行为应定诈骗罪。笔者对此有不同认识。 《刘文》认为此案应定诈骗罪的理由是:蔡胜所窃的空白转帐支票可视同为最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于当前办理盗窃案件中具体应用法律的若干问题的解答》中所指的“不能随即兑现的证券”,“因为转帐支票一无数额(无数额可计),二不能随即兑现。
Article 10 of the People’s Judicial System published a document titled “Liu Wen” entitled “What should be done to defraud goods for the purpose of stealing a check for check-in” by Comrade Liu Guozhen in the tenth issue in 1986, claiming that the defendant, Cai Sheng, Check and go to the wholesaling department of a distribution company to defraud 1500 counterfeit cigarettes valued at $ 6,177 and up to 500 cigarettes and $ 1,770 in proceeds should be defrauded . I have different understanding of this. Liu Wen believes that the case should be defrauded on the grounds that: Cai Sheng stolen blank transfer checks visible as the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate “on the current handling of the specific application of the law in the theft case of a number of questions to answer” In the meaning of “securities can not be cashed immediately,” "because the transfer checks a small amount (no amount can be counted), two can not be cashed.