《雅典的泰门》从出版以后就引起了各方的争议,特别是针对该剧的完整性存在巨大的争议,各种质疑也是不断地涌现。针对这些争议,我们倾向于接受莫理斯·查尼(Maurice Charney)的观点,就是该剧的文本并没有最终完成,但是该作品已经具备了概念上的完整性,它的故事架构、人物描写、语言特色以及戏剧处理都具有了一定的完整性。伴随现代文学批评理论的成熟和完善,对于该剧的解读也更加丰富。 Since its publication, “The Gate of Athens” has aroused controversy among all parties. In particular, there has been a huge controversy over the completeness of the drama. Various questions have also been constantly emerging. In response to these controversies, we tend to accept the view of Maurice Charney that the text of the play was not finalized, but the work is already conceptually complete, its story structure, portrayal , Language features and theatrical processing have a certain integrity. Accompanied by the maturity and improvement of modern literary criticism theory, the interpretation of the drama is also more abundant.