论文部分内容阅读
中国哲学的源与流,可以说皆由先秦诸子所奠定,《天下》篇作者以“以天为宗,以德为本”的精神,纵论天下诸子之学术;而且作者筚路蓝缕,《天下》篇也属中国学术史开山之作,其重要性可想而知。但如此重要的作品,在作者和内容评价上历来却存在着重大分歧,自“五四”进入“疑古”时代以后,分歧更加明显。文章分为两部分,一是对有关《天下》篇著作权的两派观点与论据进行梳理,并且从提供新资料入手,将《天下》篇著作权重归于庄周;二是以惠施为例证,对以胡适为代表用“科学主义”评价名家而至今仍一统天下的观点提出了质疑,认为这种所谓“科学主义”的评价,不仅是对诸子思想的误解,而且是扭曲了中国哲学应有的价值。
The origin and flow of Chinese philosophy can be said to have been laid down by all the pre-Qin philosophers. The author of “World” refers to the scholarship of all the world under the principle of “using heaven as the basis and virtue as the basis” World “articles also belong to the history of Chinese academic history, its importance can be imagined. However, such an important piece of work always contains major disagreements on the author and content evaluation. Since the May 4th Movement entered the era of doubtful history, the disagreements have become more apparent. The article is divided into two parts. One is to sort out the views and arguments of the two parties concerning the copyright of the ”world“ articles, and start with providing new information and attributing the copyright of ”World“ to Zhuang Zhou. The second is taking Hui Shi as an example, It is questioned that Hu Shih represented the evaluation of famous scientists by ”scientism“ and still dominated the world so far. He argues that this so-called ”scientism" evaluation is not only a misunderstanding of philosophers, but also a distortion of Chinese philosophy. Some value.