论文部分内容阅读
一九八一年初——一九八二年底,我在巴黎高师进修访问期间,就给罗伯斯比尔的评价问题曾与法国巴黎第七大学史学家弗洛朗斯·戈蒂埃交换过意见,她还给拙作《评罗伯斯比尔》(一九七九年十月《历史研究》刊载)写了书面意见,该“意见书”②言简意骇、观点新颖,读后颇受启发。从“意见书”来看,弗洛朗斯·戈蒂埃确实是一位对法国大革命,对罗伯斯比尔有很深研究的专家,无怪乎索布尔在给我的信中说:“在这方面的研究她比我更好。”但就她的观点来说,她把罗伯斯比尔说成是“反自由主义”的,“反资本主义”的,“反帝国主义”的、“国际主义”的等等,这是我怎么也不能赞同的。
Early 1981 - In the late 1982, during my fellowship with Paris High School, I had an exchange of views with Roberts-Beier on the issue with Florent Gordiere, a historian of the Seventh-century University of Paris She also wrote a written opinion on his book entitled “Evaluating Robespierre” (published in “Historical Studies”, October 1979), which is brief, novel and enlightened after reading . From the “submissions”, Florens Goldiere is indeed an expert who has studied the French Revolution and Robespierre very much. It is no surprise that Sobral said in a letter to me: “At She studies better than me in this respect. ”But in her opinion she describes Robespierre as“ anti-liberal, ”“ anti-capitalist, ”“ anti-imperialist, ”“ Internationalism ”and so on, which is how I can not agree.