论文部分内容阅读
哈特作为二十世纪西方新分析实证主义法学的代表人物,他在西方法理学界被普遍认为是法律实证质疑的最高水平。哈特在《法律的概念》中提出的各个问题都成为了西方法理学界研究的重点对象,但在我国对他的研究大多停留在总体的评介层面上,缺乏对其子问题的重点研究。本文将围绕哈特自由裁量理论的构建、德沃金的批判以及哈特的回应,展开关于自由裁量权的探讨。
As the representative of the new Western analytical positivist jurisprudence in the twentieth century, Hart was generally considered to be the highest level of legal empirical questioning in Western jurisprudence. All the issues raised by Hart in The Concept of Law have become the focus of the study of Western jurisprudence. However, most of his studies in China remain at the level of overall evaluation and lack the key research on his sub-problems. This article will focus on the construction of Hart’s theory of discretion, Dworkin’s critique and Hart’s response, to explore the issue of discretion.