论文部分内容阅读
法律效果与社会效果相统一,是我国一项重要的司法政策。法律效果与社会效果对应于法律推理的形式性和实质性,英美两国的司法实践在法律推理的面貌上有形式化与实质化的倾向之别,其制度结构上的差异是形成这种差别的重要原因。我国强调法律效果与社会效果相统一,由金字塔型全息式的政治权力结构所决定。在这种结构中,任何一个子系统都服从并且承担着整个系统的功能预期,法院要实现社会对整个国家权力系统的功能期待,也就必然要追求法律效果与社会效果的统一。不过,由于我国法官身处在科层制之中,严格遵循法条、奉行规则主义,是风险最小的理性选择,而这与实现两个效果相统一的要求有时不相一致。缘于权力结构的要求,又受制于科层制的结构,是该项司法政策可能面临的现实问题。
The unity of legal effect and social effect is an important judicial policy of our country. Legal effects and social effects correspond to the formality and substantive nature of legal reasoning. The judicial practice in both Anglo-American countries differs from the formalized and substantive tendencies in legal reasoning. The difference in institutional structure is the result of this difference The important reason. Our country emphasizes the unity of legal effect and social effect, which is decided by the pyramid holographic political power structure. In this structure, any one subsystem obeys and assumes the functional expectation of the whole system. If the court wants to realize the social expectation of the function of the whole country’s power system, it must also pursue the unification of the legal effect and the social effect. However, since our countrymen are in the bureaucracy, strictly observing the law and pursuing the rule of law, they are the least risky rational choices that are sometimes inconsistent with the requirement of unifying the two effects. Due to the requirement of the power structure and the structure of bureaucracy, it is a realistic problem that this judicial policy may face.