论文部分内容阅读
国内世界古代史学界至今存在着一个理论误区:以恩格斯和摩尔根当年的论断为依据,把希腊的“荷马时代”看作军事民主制时期,列入野蛮时代高级阶段;由此带来的是对早期国家形态作为一个相当长的历史过渡阶段的忽视以及对它的某些重要特点的错误认识.本文试图从分析摩尔根和恩格斯笔下的“荷马时代”①及有关社会现象入手,并以我国商周时代为主要参照系,用比较研究法对上述问题进行简要的探讨.
To date, there is a theoretical misunderstanding in the history of the ancient Chinese history in the world: based on the assertions of the year of Engels and Morgan, the “Homeric Times” in Greece were regarded as the period of military democracy and included in the advanced stage of barbarism; Is a neglect of the early state form as a fairly long historical transitional period and its misunderstanding of some important features.This paper attempts to start with the analysis of the “Homeric Times” and related social phenomena by Morgan and Engels Taking the era of Shang and Zhou Dynasties in our country as the main frame of reference, a comparative study of the above issues is briefly discussed.