论文部分内容阅读
目的调查工读男生与普通男生人格特征及其父母教养方式的差异,并探究二者的关系。方法用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)考查工读男生与普通男生人格特征的差异,用父母教养方式评价量表(EMBU)考查工读男生与普通男生父母教养方式的差异。结果1工读男生在P、E、N和L4种人格特征上,与普通男生之间均存在显著差异。2工读男生在FF1、MF1、FF3、FF5和FF65种父母教养方式上,与普通男生之间存在显著差异。3工读男生人格特征的N分与父母教养方式中的FF2、FF3、FF5正相关显著,L分与MF3负相关显著;普通男生人格特征的P分与父母教养方式中的FF2、MF2、MF4正相关显著,N分与FF2、FF5、FF6正相关显著。结论工读生的人格发展具有显著不良倾向;这与其所受不良的父母教养方式有关。
Objective To investigate the differences of personality traits and parental rearing styles between male and female boys and girls and explore their relationship. Methods The differences of personality traits between male and common boys were studied by EPQ. The difference of parents’ parental rearing styles between male and common boys was examined by EMBU. Results 1 male college students in P, E, N and L4 personality traits, there are significant differences between boys and boys. There are significant differences between male and female boys in working-class style of FF1, MF1, FF3, FF5 and FF65. There was a significant positive correlation between the N score and the parental rearing patterns FF2, FF3 and FF5, and the negative correlation between the L score and the MF3. The P score of the average male personality and FF2, MF2 and MF4 in parental rearing patterns Significant correlation, N points and FF2, FF5, FF6 significant positive correlation. Conclusions The personality development of college students has a significant negative tendency; this is related to the poor parental rearing patterns.