无论是当事人主义,还是庭审改革,都是非常陈旧的话题了。特别是前者,已经基本在一流的学术刊物目录中销声匿迹了。究其原因有二:一是研究者很难在这些传统问题上超越前辈,再挖掘出新矿;二是这些经典问题可能被认为已经解决了,因此还有什么必要在宝贵的核心期刊资源上用于这些老问题的重述呢。 Both the doctrine of parties and the trial reform are very old topics. Especially the former, has basically disappeared in the first-class academic publications directory. There are two reasons for this: First, it is very hard for researchers to surpass their predecessors on these traditional issues and then dig new mines; second, these classical issues may be considered as having been solved, so what is the need for valuable core journals resources? Used to restate these old problems.