论文部分内容阅读
20世纪90年代初冷战的结束不仅改变了国际格局,也对国际关系理论的发展造成了巨大冲击。以沃尔兹结构现实主义为首的诸多国际关系理论在预测冷战结局时集体失灵,使得理论界在冷战后进入了迷思破裂后的彷徨期。在美国学者们关于冷战如何结束的研究中,以沃尔弗斯为代表的物质主义者们和克莱默、英格里斯等为代表的观念主义者们进行了持续的论争,使国际关系理论的发展得到了丰富。另一方面,以加迪斯为首的历史学家们借理论预测失准之机,对整个国际关系理论的科学化趋势提出了尖锐的批评。在对冷战结束前夜对未来的种种理论预测、物质主义者和观念主义者的论战、历史主义者和国际关系理论家们的论战分别进行了回顾、梳理和评论的基础上,能够得出有关未来的国际关系理论应如何建设的某些启示。
The end of the Cold War in the early 1990s not only changed the international situation but also caused a huge impact on the development of the theory of international relations. Many theories of international relations led by Walter’s structural realism failed to predict the outcome of the Cold War. As a result, theorists had entered a period of recovery after the Cold War. In the studies of American scholars on how the Cold War ended, the materialists represented by Wolfschwein and the conceptists represented by Kramer and Inglese held a continuous argument that the theory of international relations The development has been enriched. On the other hand, historians headed by Cadiz have borrowed the chance to predict misalignment and sharply criticized the scientific trend of the entire theory of international relations. On the basis of the various theoretical predictions made on the eve of the end of the Cold War, the controversy between the materialists and the conceptualists, the controversies between the historicists and the international relations theorists respectively, it is possible to come to the conclusion that the future Some Implications of How to Build Theory of International Relations.