《尚书古文疏证》辨《古文尚书》和孔安国传之伪,在史料鉴别上可以说是一部极有价值的著作,在辨伪方法上也提供了可贵的经验。但是由于时代及作者个人的局限,《疏证》在某些方面存在着不足,随着我国学术视野的开阔,学界对其进行了新的审视。笔者借此将《疏证》的研究分为大陆、港澳台及海外三部分,从通论综述、具体问题两方面来考察。 “Shang Shu Gu Wen Shu Zheng” identified “Gu Wen Shang Shu” and Kong An Guo Chuan pseudo, in the identification of historical data can be said to be a very valuable book, in the pseudo-method also provides valuable experience. However, due to the limitations of the times and the individual of the author, there are some shortcomings in the “evading syndromes”. As the academic horizon of our country is broadened, the academic circle has conducted a new look at it. The author divides the research on “evading syndromes” into three parts: the mainland, Hong Kong, Maucao and overseas countries, and examines the general comments and the specific problems.