论文部分内容阅读
苏联模式具有很强的调节和控制能力，以保持自身的稳定性，并 排除一切可能给模式自身所带来的内部和外部的破坏性因素。苏联模式最初具有很 高的效率，这证明中央超级集权模式高效率的时段性。但苏联模式的功效因自身因素 所限会自动产生递减规律。苏联模式自身产生无组织力量──恶性膨胀的官僚特权 集团和腐败，这就使模式自身不断受到无组织力量的侵蚀和损害。长期以来，苏联官 僚特权集团将苏联模式作为实现其自身利益的最好载体。苏联模式自身超级稳定系 统的存在使得改革苏联模式的每一次局部性尝试都归于失败。改革苏联模式不仅具 有很大的理论可能性，而且具有现实的可操作性。苏联不是因为搞了社会主义而亡党 亡国，恰恰相反，正是因为它们违背了社会主义的基本规律而导致了悲剧的发生。苏 联模式的失败根本不是社会主义的失败。在２０世纪，苏联所出现的三个意外说明一个 最重要问题，即在贫穷落后的国家如何建设社会主义，怎样建设社会主义的根本问 题。
The Soviet model has strong regulatory and control capabilities to maintain its own stability and to exclude all the internal and external destructive factors that it may bring to the model itself. The initial high efficiency of the Soviet model proves the efficient timeliness of the central super-centralized model. However, the effectiveness of the Soviet model will automatically reduce its own factors. The Soviet model itself generates unorganized power - a viciously swaddled bureaucratic privilege of corruption and corruption that constantly erodes and harms the model itself by unorganized forces. For a long time, Soviet bureaucratic privileges groups used the Soviet model as the best vehicle for realizing their own interests. The existence of the super-stable system of the Soviet Union’s own system led to the failure of every partial attempt to reform the Soviet model. The reform of the Soviet model not only has a great theoretical possibility, but also has practical operability. The Soviet Union did not demolish its party and demolish the country because of engaging in socialism. On the contrary, it is precisely because they violated the basic laws of socialism that it led to the tragedy. The failure of the Soviet model is not a failure of socialism at all. In the 20th century, three surprises in the Soviet Union showed one of the most important issues: how to build socialism in poor and backward countries and how to build the fundamental issue of socialism.