李国民认为,改革后,农村公共品出现了除政府(无偿)供给外新的供给方式,如混合供给(民建公助、公办民建)和市场供给(企业帮办、个人承担)等。这些方式的出现,一定程度上缓解了农村公共品供求矛盾,但是由于政府对公共品供给的管理体制滞后,造成公共品供给效率低下。管理体制滞后,首先表现在政府对公共品资金的筹措、管理、使用缺乏规范的监督。无论是国家的支农资金,还是地方政府中制度内与制度外公共支出资金,都没有实行专门统一管理,并且经常被挪为他用,造成公共品资金管理混乱。在资金使用过程方面,不注重项目的成本效益分析,而且对资金的使用缺乏激励约束机制。其次,政府对各种供给方式缺乏必要的规范。政府公共 Li Guomin believes that after the reform, rural public goods appeared in addition to the government (gratuitous) supply of new modes of supply, such as mixed supply (the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of the PRC, public-owned construction) and market supply (business help, personal commitment). The emergence of these methods has alleviated the contradiction between supply and demand of rural public goods to some extent. However, due to the government’s lagging management system of public goods supply, the supply of public goods is inefficient. The management system is lagging behind. First of all, it shows in the lack of normative supervision by the government on the financing, management and use of public goods funds. No matter whether it is the state’s funds for supporting agriculture or the public expenditures within and outside the system of local governments, there is no special unified management and is often diverted to other uses, resulting in the chaotic management of public goods and funds. In terms of the process of using funds, it does not pay attention to the cost-benefit analysis of the project and lacks incentive and restraint mechanisms for the use of funds. Second, the government lacks necessary norms for various forms of supply. Government public