论文部分内容阅读
本文依据功能原理对藏语拉萨口语中的兼类词re?~(231)、tu?~(231)进行分析,认为re?~(231)至少可以分为判断动词“是”、存在动词“在”和句尾助词三类,tu?~(231)至少可以分为存在动词“有”和句尾助词两类。动词re?~(231)、tu?~(231)是两个不同的系统。它们分别有变体jin~(12)、re?~(231)和jφ ?~(231)、tu?~(231)、Jo?~(12)re、ca,它们与主体人称的关系分为照应与不照应两类。在照应关系中,jin~(12)、re?~(231)、jφ?~(231)、tu?~(231)、jo?~(12)re、ca互补分布;作为句尾助词,它们的功能是伴随动词表“体”。在非照应关系中,re?~(231)、tu?~(231)或表被动态,或表自主性与非自主性、自我与非自我、经常性与临时性、熟知与初见、亲见/肯定与非亲见/估计等多种语义特征的对立。
Based on the functional principle, this article analyzes the recumbent terms re? ~ (231), tu ~ (231) in Tibetan Lhasa Oral Language and concludes that re ~ ~ (231) can be at least divided into judging verb “yes Verb ”at “ and the end of the sentence particle three categories, tu ~ ~ (231) can be divided into at least the existence of the verb ”has “ and the end of the sentence two. The verbs re? ~ (231), tu ~ ~ (231) are two different systems. They have the variations jin ~ (12), re ~ (231) and jφ ~ 231, tu ~ 231, Jo ~ 12 re, ca, respectively, Careful and unrecognized two categories. In the correspondence relationship, j ~ ~ (12), re ~ ~ (231), jφ ~ 231, tu ~ 231, jo ~ 12 re, ca are complementary distributions; The function is accompanied by the verb table ”body ". In non-corresponding relationship, re ~ ~ (231), tu ~ (231) or table is dynamic, or table autonomy and involuntary, self and non-self, regular and temporary, familiar and first seen, pro See / Confrontation with Nonsensical / Estimation and Other Semantic Features.