论文部分内容阅读
目的筛选出一套代表性好、实用性强的社区中医药发展评价指标体系,能准确反映社区中医药工作开展的情况。方法通过2轮德尔菲专家咨询法筛选出社区中医药评价指标。结果 2轮德尔菲筛选出评价指标35个,专家咨询的积极系数依次为88.46%、100.0%、协调系数依次为0.36、0.62,权威程度为0.824和0.848。结论本研究德尔菲专家咨询积极系数较高,权威度和协调度有所上升,初步确立了深圳市社区实用中医药评价指标体系。
Objectives Screening out a set of representative and practical evaluation index system of community Chinese medicine development can accurately reflect the situation of community Chinese medicine work. Methods The evaluation indexes of community Chinese medicine were screened through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Results Two rounds of Delphi screened out 35 evaluation indexes, the positive coefficients of expert consultation were 88.46% and 100.0% respectively, the coordination coefficients were 0.36 and 0.62 respectively, and the authority levels were 0.824 and 0.848. Conclusion This study Delphi counselor positive coefficient is higher, the authority and coordination has increased, initially established in Shenzhen community practical evaluation index system of Chinese medicine.