论文部分内容阅读
法律解释方法研究在我国已取得了丰硕的理论成果,但因绝大多数研究是对西方既有理论的学习与借鉴,理论研究对本土司法实践关注不足,导致理论与实践之间未能形成有效的、良性地互动。本文采用实证研究的方法,以客观数据回应法律方法理论界长久以来对于“法官是否认知、认同法律解释方法”的疑问。通过相关数据的收集、整理及归纳,将司法实践中法官对法律解释方法熟悉程度及其运用自觉程度、法官对疑难案件的处理方法与偏好、法官认知与思维规则、影响法官预判与裁判的主客观因素等情况进行了全面的展示。并将上述法官观点与法学学说进行比较,分析两者之间的契合点与差异点,从而勾勒出法律解释方法在司法实践中的全息图像,为法律方法理论进一步的研究及运用提供实证基础。
However, most of the studies are based on the study and reference of the existing theories in the West. Theoretical studies have paid insufficient attention to the local judicial practice, resulting in the failure of the theory and practice to be effective And, benignly interact. In this paper, empirical research methods to objective data to respond to legal theory has long been for the “judge whether the cognition, recognition of the legal interpretation of” questions. Through the collection, sorting and induction of relevant data, the judicial practice of the judge familiar with the legal interpretation of the degree and the degree of its use of consciousness, the judge’s handling of difficult cases and preferences, the judge’s cognition and thinking rules, affecting the judge’s judgment and judgment The subjective and objective factors such as a comprehensive display. And compares the above judge’s perspective with that of jurisprudence to analyze the points of convergence and differences between the two, so as to outline the holographic image of legal interpretation in judicial practice and provide an empirical basis for the further study and application of legal methodology.