古人没有“画家书法”一说。书与画究竟是同源还是不同源,书画界曾经讨论过一阵,后来不了了之。其实讨论的题外并不在“源”字上,而是为了各立山头,上世纪八十年代初,自从书法家协会从美术家协会分辖出来,看似书画繁荣了,然而门户之见也越拉越大,越走越远,各自设立各自的审美标准,这样画家就真的是“画家”了,书家也就真的是“书家”了。要说画家书法就不得不说到文人画,文人画的特 The ancients did not say “painter calligraphy”. Is the book or painting the same or different source, the painting and calligraphy industry once discussed it for a while, then it can not. In fact, the title of the discussion is not on the “source”, but for all the hills, the early eighties of last century, since the calligraphers Association from the Artists Association, it seems that painting and calligraphy boom, but the portal opinion The bigger and the bigger and the bigger and the farther the farther apart, each set up their own aesthetic standards, so the painter is really a “painter”, and the bookmaker is really a “book writer”. Speaking of painters calligraphy have to say that the literati painting, literati painting special