论文部分内容阅读
通过对乡村司法现状的田野考察发现,乡村社会依然存在着司法形态多元化特点。然而,多元化并不必然带来乡村司法的有序化。究其原因,不同的司法形态在管辖权问题上存在着隐性的竞争关系。因为这种竞争关系的存在,乡村司法资源供给错综复杂,乡村司法结构混乱,这些情况都不利于乡村司法的合法性建构和乡村秩序的重建。研究表明:乡村司法的合法性建构不仅仅只是国家权力和符号权力的建构,更应该是一种具体实践意义上的合法性建构。这种合法性建构要求以多元司法知识为基础,以行动者需求为导向,通过非正式司法的伦理重建和正式司法的权限界定来实现乡村司法资源供给的合理配置,并使民众能够更好地“接近司法”。
Through the field investigation of the status quo of the rural courts, it is found that there still exists the diversity of judicial forms in rural society. However, pluralism does not necessarily lead to the ordering of rural justice. The reason is that different judicial forms have implicit competition on the issue of jurisdiction. Because of the existence of such competitive relations, the supply of judicial resources in rural areas is complex and the judicial structure in rural areas is chaotic. All these are not conducive to the construction of the legitimacy of rural justice and the reconstruction of rural order. The research shows that the legitimacy construction of rural justice is not only the construction of state power and symbolic power, but also the construction of legitimacy in concrete practical sense. This construction of legitimacy requires the diversification of judicial knowledge as the basis, the demand of actors as the guide, the rational allocation of judicial resources in rural areas through the definition of the power of ethics reconstruction and formal justice in informal justice, and the public can better “Close to justice ”.