论文部分内容阅读
与传统国际知识产权公约相比,《TRIPs协定》第一次全面、深入地处理了知识产权保护的国内执法问题,规定了数量众多的执行条款。“中美知识产权保护与执行案”不仅是第一个直接涉及《TRIPs协定》执行条款的案件,而且也是多边贸易体制历史上第一个直接涉及刑事指控的案件。该案裁决不仅澄清了《TRIPs协定》某些重要执行条款的解释和适用,而且对于该协定其他执行条款的解释和适用具有重要参考价值,必将对知识产权的保护实践以及知识产权法的发展产生重要影响。
Compared with the traditional international intellectual property conventions, the TRIPs Agreement deals with the first comprehensive and in-depth treatment of the domestic law enforcement issues concerning the protection of intellectual property and stipulates a large number of implementation provisions. The case of “Protection and Enforcement of IPR between China and the United States” was not only the first case directly involved in the implementation of the TRIPs Agreement, but also the first case in the history of the MTS that directly involved criminal charges. The ruling of the case not only clarified the interpretation and application of some important implementation provisions of the TRIPs Agreement, but also has important reference value for the interpretation and application of the other implementation provisions of the TRIPs Agreement. It is bound to have a great influence on the protection practice of intellectual property and the development of intellectual property law Have a significant impact.