论文部分内容阅读
引言孙诒让在《札适叙》中略论清代校书源流道:“综论厥善,大氐以旧刊精校为据依,而究其微旨,通其大例,精研博考,不参成见。其谩正文字讹舛,或求之于本书,或旁征之它籍,及援引之类书。而以声类通转为之辖键,故能发疑正读,奄若合符。及其蔽也,则或穿穴形声,捃摭新异;冯臆改易,以是为非。乾嘉大师,唯王氏父子郅为精博。凡举一谊,皆确凿不刊。其余诸家,得失间出。”~①孙氏对于清代校勘工作的总体论断是实事求是的,对于王氏父子的评议也是实事求是的。当初,海康陈观楼(昌齐)见王念孙所校《大戴礼记》和《淮南子》,叹为卓识精
Introduction Sun Yat-sen in the “Sapporo Syria,” a brief account of the Qing Dynasty school books Source: “comprehensive Jue Shan, Tai Chi to the old jing jing school as the basis, and its micro-purpose, through its large, refined research , Do not participate in the meeting. The text is correct, or begged in this book, or expedition of its membership, and cited the book. Coincides. And its cover also, or wear acupuncture points, the new differences; Feng Ji change easy, so right and wrong .Gao Jia master, only Wang’s father and son 郅 for the fine Bo .Where to hold a friendship, are indeed not published The rest of the family, gains and losses out of. ”~ ① Sun’s general thesis for the collation of the Qing Dynasty is a matter of fact, Wang’s father and son’s comment is also realistic. At first, Haikang Chen concept floor (Chang Qi) see Wang Nian Sun school “Dai Dai Li Ji” and “Huainanzi”