本文通过对五部新编续志在体式、结构、篇目设置、内容、特色、图片与索引等七个方面的比较研究 ,对其优点与不足进行了客观论述。认为续志宜采用中篇体式 ,时间断限不应强求一致 ,可适当上溯下叙 ,在“续”的同时加强“修”的内容 ,也要考虑到对思想意识的记述 ,对图片和索引加以重视 ,并将“专家修志”落到实处。 This article objectively discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the five new editions in seven aspects: body style, structure, setting of topics, content, characteristics, pictures and indexes. It is suggested that the follow-up should be in the style of medium-length, the time limit should not be unanimity, may be appropriate to trace back to the next, in the “continued” at the same time strengthening the “repair” content, but also take into account the ideological consciousness of the picture and index To pay attention to, and “experts Chi” implemented.