论文部分内容阅读
《敦煌本文選注》的斷代上限可劃至武德三年到七年之間,下限可劃至貞觀年間,可能是現存最早的《文選》注本;《敦煌本文選注》多有常識性錯誤、體例隨意,應屬於大眾知識份子的普及性注本;以《敦煌本文選注》爲起點的佚名注綜合研究有助於解決佚名注的研究争議,重繪唐代的選學圖景;《敦煌本文選注》可以證明:一,在俄藏敦煌φ242號《文選注》的斷代問題上,“撮鈔”說可能難以成立;二,俄藏敦煌φ242號《文選注》不是曹憲的《文選音義》,而是大眾知識份子的普及性注本;三,《文選鈔》的著者可能不是公孫羅;四,唐代的選學發展應由精英十經典和大眾+普及這兩部分交互發展而成。
The upper limit of the “Dunhuang anthology” can be set between the three years and the seven years of martial arts, the lower limit can be zoned to Zhenguan years, may be the earliest existing “anthologies” Notes; “Dunhuang anthology” more common sense The error and the free way should belong to the popularization note of mass intellectuals. The anonymous note synthesis research starting from “Dunhuang anthology of this essay” is helpful to solve the research controversy of anonymous note and redraw the elective scene of the Tang Dynasty. This paper can be proved by Dunhuang: “(1) It can be difficult to say that the” Notes on the Notes “of No. 242 in Dunhuang, Russia, may be difficult to set up; , But the popularization of popular intellectuals; Third, the author of ”anthology of textual election" may not be Gongsunluo; Fourth, the development of the election of the Tang Dynasty should be composed of the elite ten classics and the popularization of these two parts Interaction and development.