论文部分内容阅读
在民事案件诉讼中,人们更多注重的是实体公正性,也就是案件中的财产及人身关系,而没有重视程序的公正性。在2006年发生的“彭玉案”中通过经验法则进行裁决,更加体现了案件的客观性与真实性,使得判决结果更加公平、公正,从而有效解决民事诉讼,并获得社会的普遍赞同。我国与英美国家在历史背景、文化传统以及诉讼体系等方面存在着较大的差异,但是在案件认定方面来说,经验法则作为一种客观存在的规律,受到世界各个国家司法界的认可。但是不同国家对于经验法则的理解与运用存在着一定的差异。文章主要针对我国民事案件诉讼中的经验法则展开分析。
In the civil case lawsuit, people pay more attention to the substantive justice, that is, the property and personal relationship in the case, without paying due attention to the fairness of the procedure. In “Peng Yu case” that occurred in 2006, the ruling by the rule of thumb further reflected the objectivity and authenticity of the case and made the judgment more fair and equitable so as to effectively solve the civil litigation and obtain the general approval of the society . China and Anglo-American countries have great differences in historical background, cultural traditions and litigation system. However, in the aspect of case identification, as a kind of objective law of existence, the rule of thumb is endorsed by the judicial circles of all countries in the world. However, there are some differences in the understanding and application of the rule of thumb in different countries. The article mainly analyzes the rule of thumb in litigation of civil cases in our country.