20世纪60年代以后,受法国解构论哲学的影响,解释学领域出现了一批极具颠覆性的理论。它们虽然保留着“以文本作为基本理解单位”的传统解释学的学科特征,但都对其依赖的形而上学思想制度发起猛烈批判。这种批判显示了解释学哲学固有或应有的解构论本性,为解释学带来了从形而上学范式向解构论范式的转换。与此相应,一些解释学哲学史家还形成了全新的解释学历史叙述。为此,本文将逐次讨论:何谓解构论解释学?解构论解释学如何成为一种历史叙述?解构论解释学的核心范式是什么?解构论解释学是否具有去蔽效应? After the 1960s, influenced by the French deconstructionist philosophy, a number of highly disruptive theories emerged in the field of hermeneutics. Although they retain the “Her text as the basic unit of understanding” of the traditional hermeneutic characteristics of the discipline, but they all rely on metaphysical thinking system launched a fierce criticism. This criticism shows the intrinsic or deconstruction nature of the philosophy of hermeneutics, which brings about the transformation from the metaphysics paradigm to the deconstruction paradigm. Correspondingly, some hermeneutic philosophical historians have also formed a brand new historical interpretation of hermeneutics. To this end, this article will be discussed in succession: What is deconstruction theory of hermeneutics? Deconstruction theory how to become a historical narrative? Deconstruction theory is the core paradigm of hermeneutics?