论文部分内容阅读
通过辨析人口流动模型中的刘易斯模型和托达罗模型的关键分歧,即农业劳动者在城市的工资是如何决定的,可以解释为什么大规模的人口流动没有显著提高中国农民的收入,以及巨大的城乡差距为什么没有导致农业劳动者在城市中的大量失业等问题。我国城乡收入差距存在的关键在于:中国经济转型中保留的城乡间的存量体制具有自我强化的机制,城乡二元体制的转换可能因为城市部门缺乏激励而陷入停滞。
By analyzing the key disagreements between the Lewis model and the Todaro model in the Migration Model, that is, how wages of agricultural workers in the cities are determined, it can explain why large-scale population movements did not significantly increase the incomes of Chinese farmers and the huge Why the gap between urban and rural areas did not result in a large number of unemployed workers in urban areas such as unemployment. The key to the existence of the income gap between urban and rural areas in China lies in the self-reinforcing mechanism of the stock system between urban and rural areas preserved in China’s economic restructuring. The transition of the urban-rural dualistic system may have stalled due to the lack of incentives in urban departments.