论文部分内容阅读
第二轮修志以来,“改革开放”集中记述被视为突出时代特点的好方法。但随着方志事业的发展和方志理论研究的逐步深化,“改革开放”集中记述的理论矛盾,“改革开放”篇章与相应专业门类事物的重叠、分离、混乱、不系统现象及编写中的重重困难等问题逐渐显露出来。因此,市县志“改革开放”记述方式,并不适宜集中记述或集中分散相结合记述,而适宜以专业门类为单位,根据体制改革内容的多少,采取设立专门章节,或专题类目,或在专业志正文中叙述。
Since the second round of revision, the “reform and opening up” centralized account is regarded as a good way to highlight the characteristics of the times. However, with the development of the cause of chronicles and the gradual deepening of the study of the theory of chronicles, the theoretical contradictions concentrated on “reform and opening up”, the overlapping, separation, confusion and unsystematic phenomena of the articles of “reform and opening up” and the corresponding professional categories and Writing difficulties and other issues gradually revealed. Therefore, it is not appropriate for metropolitan and county-level “reform and opening up” methods to narrate or focus on decentralized combination of narratives, but rather on the basis of professional departments, according to the content of the system reform, special sections or special categories should be set up, Or in the professional Chi text described.