论文部分内容阅读
傅著从谏议制度之运作过程与文人文学活动的关系着眼,更为重视文人在具体的政治身份背景下的创作活动,将职事活动与文学活动有机地加以联系,为制度运作与文人的创作活动构建了一个可供对话的平台。将其研究方法落实到唐代政治制度与文人之文学活动的关系上同样具有有效性,尤其是关于翰林院制度、御史制度等制度层面,以御史制度的运作过程与文人的文学创作的关系来看,傅著对谏议制度与文人关系的考察为我们提供了一个标本,不只是搭建了一个流动的平台,还演示了自己对这个标本的操作过程和理解能力。制度规范所形成的创作背景作为研究的出发点产生的研究效应已经开始彰显,结合具体的文人心态与政治制度、政治事件的关系也成为一种研究取向,这样,傅著也就具有了方法论层面上的研究意义。
Focusing on the relationship between the operation of the system of remonstrance and the literary activities of the literati, Fu Zhu paid more attention to the creative activities of the literati under the background of specific political identities, and organically linked the office work and the literary activities, Creative activities build a platform for dialogue. It is equally valid to carry out the research methods from the Tang Dynasty to the literary activities of the literati, especially regarding the system of imperial court system and censorial system. Taking the operation of the Censor system and literary creation of the literati From the perspective of relationship, Fu Zuo’s investigation of the relationship between the system of remonstrance and the literati provided us with a specimen, not only setting up a mobile platform but also demonstrating his own operational process and understanding of the specimen. The research effect of the creative background formed by institutional norms as the starting point of the study has begun to show. Combining the mentality of the literati and the political system, the relationship between political events has also become a research orientation. In this way, Fu Za also has a methodological level Research significance.