论文部分内容阅读
我国《公司法》中关于股东知情权的规定较为抽象、原则,而司法实践中股东知情权纠纷的案情具有多样性特点。上述原因决定了股东知情权纠纷中的司法裁量有其特定的存在价值。股东知情权纠纷中的司法裁量涉及合理性判断与合法性判断两方面问题。股东知情权纠纷中的合理性判断围绕同业公平竞争、公司科学治理和化解公司僵局进行。股东知情权纠纷中的合法性判断从主体适格性、正当目的性以及公司协助义务三方面展开。
The Company Law of the People’s Republic of China on the shareholders’ right to information is more abstract, the principle of judicial practice and the shareholders of the right to information disputes with a diversity of features. The above reasons determine that the judicial discretion in shareholders’ right to information dispute has its own specific value of existence. Judicial discretion in shareholders’ right to information dispute involves two aspects: judgments of rationality and judgments of legitimacy. The judgments on the reasonableness of shareholders’ right to information dispute focus on the fair competition among peers, the company’s scientific governance and the corporate deadlock. The judgments of legitimacy in shareholders’ right to information disputes begin from three aspects: the main body’s fitness, legitimate purpose and company’s obligation to assist.