本文试图通过对《孟子》与《战国策》作比较分析,说明儒家和纵横家辩辞的差别,着重展现两家在道义与权术问题上的争锋,以及温敦醇厚与辩丽多姿的殊异。进而说明导致两家较量胜负殊异是儒士与策士们所持政见不同所致。 This article attempts to make a comparative analysis of Mencius and Warring States Policy to illustrate the differences between the Confucian and the literary and artificers in their argument of defense, emphasizing the two conflicts over morality and power and the merits and demerits of Winton different. This shows that the two win over the difference between Confucianism and policy makers held by different political perspective.