论文部分内容阅读
历史叙事写作在西方史学史中曾占据中心地位,但在史学科学化的过程中,这一写作模式遭到了前所未有的质疑,虽然20世纪70年代以来,出现了叙事体复兴的趋势,但相关争议远未结束。本文分析了历史叙事边缘化的理论背景:史学科学化对其“求真”“求规律”能力的质疑,并简析了后现代主义历史理论对历史叙事独特价值的发掘,在此基础上,笔者认为历史叙事是不可或缺的历史写作模式,可以与分析体的历史写作并行不悖。
Historical narrative writing has occupied a central position in the history of Western historiography. However, this mode of writing has been hitherto unknown in the process of scientific historiography. Although the trend of revival of narrative has appeared since the 1970s, Far from over. This paper analyzes the theoretical background of the marginalization of historical narrative: the historiography of science questioned its ability to “seek truth” and “seek regularity”, and analyzed the excavation of the unique value of historical narration by the postmodernist theory of history Based on this, I believe that historical narrative is an indispensable historical writing mode that can go hand in hand with the historical writing of analytic body.