《荀子·劝学》篇“假舆马者,非利足也,而致千里…‘故不积跬步,无以至千里”两句中分别用到“致”和“至”两个词语。人教版教参对两个词的解释是相同的,都解释成了“到达”。既然两个词表达的意义相同为什么不用同一个字,抑或后人的解释值得推敲,还是传抄过程中存在错误,为此笔者查阅了大量资料,提出两点浅见与同行商榷。一、据《辞海》对两词的解释“至”共有七个义项,分别为:①到,来;②极,最;③大;④古代指夏至、冬至;⑤至于;⑥得当;⑦至善。其中只有“到,来”这一义项可以解释“无以至千里”。“致”的义项也有七个,分别为:①送达;② “Xunzi Encouraging Learning” articles “Fake public horse, non-profit enough, and caused thousands of miles ... ... so do not accumulate, miles to thousands of miles,” were used in the two “to” and “to Two words. PEP teaching interpretation of the two words are the same, are interpreted as ”arrived “. Since the two words mean the same reason why not the same word, or the interpretation of future generations worthy of scrutiny, or the copying process there is a mistake, for which I access to a large amount of information, put forward two humble views and colleagues to discuss. First, according to ”Ci Hai“ interpretation of the word ”to “ There are seven senses, namely: ① to, come; ② pole, most; ③ large; ④ ancient refers to the summer solstice, the winter solstice; ⑤ as; ⑥ proper; ⑦ perfection. Among them, only the meaning of ”to, come “ can explain ”without limit“. ”To " also has seven items, respectively: ① delivery; ②