论文部分内容阅读
宪法上的平等权条款能够衍生解释为国家承担平等对待各地方的义务,因此,国家在分配地方立法权时须适当考量地方的平等性问题。作为比较法中的两种极端,美法两国的地方立法权配置虽然出发点不同,但都存在地方间平等的考量。我国宪法中的地方性法规制定权分配也应结合平等权条款予以适当解释,不过它是国家平等赋权模式的渐进版,即不断对地方立法权进行扩容从而更平等地满足各地方的立法需求,目前既有及未来潜在的扩容促进了地方层级和种类平等,因此具有正当性。平等化的立法权整体性扩容将使法体系的融贯性受到挑战,出于维护社会主义法制统一的目的,应当一方面在事权划分的基础上区分立法调整对象,另一方面强化法规审查机制的作用。
The constitutional equal rights clause can be interpreted as the obligation of the state to assume the equal treatment of all localities. Therefore, when assigning local legislative power, the state must give due consideration to the issue of equality at the local level. As the two extremes in the comparative law, although the starting points for the allocation of local legislative power between the United States and France differ from each other, equality between the two places exists. The distribution of the local statutory power in our country’s constitution should also be properly explained in the light of the equal rights clause. However, it is an incremental version of the national equality empowerment model, that is, it constantly expands the local legislative power so as to satisfy the legislative needs of all localities more equally It is therefore justified that existing and future potential expansion has promoted equality at the local level and by species. The overall expansion of the equal legislative power will make the coherence of the legal system challenged. For the purpose of safeguarding the unity of the socialist legal system, we should, on the one hand, differentiate the object of legislative adjustment on the basis of the division of power and the other, Role.