知识产权的司法保护受到我国各级人民法院的普遍重视并积累了宝贵经验,但在发展和实践中,面临着发展的瓶颈和困境,制约其功能的全面发挥。特别是党的十八届四中全会把推进国家法治体系和法治能力现代化作为全面深化改革的总目标,对社会治理赋予了更高层次和全新历史图景。本刊从众多来稿中精选5篇文章,编成本专题,以期为我国知识产权司法保护的演进和完善奉献绵薄之力。文章内容包括:电子游戏产业的发展,改变了公众的娱乐生活方式,更是带来了层出不穷的法律问题,搭便车、恶意模仿等山寨化现象侵犯了相关权利主体的合法利益,破坏了公平、合理的市场竞争秩序。针对苹果公司在推广苹果手机时采用捆绑用户的后续软件消费渠道,以期衍生更多的商业利益的营销模式,用户和经销商户对苹果手机“越狱”行为是否侵犯了苹果公司的版权技术保护措施进行了法理阐述,对知识产权审判庭法官研判同类案例有较高的借鉴价值。“陷阱取证”在民事诉讼法中还是个全新的概念,从被侵权人是否可以通过这种方法获取证据,到获取的证据是否可以在审判中被采用都存在着争议;完善和规范“陷阱取证”方式,促使“陷阱取证”成为被侵权人手中保护自己合法权益的利器,可以弥补被侵权人在软件知识产权侵权案件中“先天”的弱势地位。此外,在知识产权侵权诉讼中,损害赔偿数额的确定方面尚未形成针对其特殊性而设计的完整、有效的解决方案,亟待从诉讼证据制度上予以完善。知识产权审判“白皮书”作为人民法院深度参与社会治理的方式,有其独特和不可替代的作用,有助于深刻反思知识产权司法保护普遍存在的漏洞、问题和不足。相信这些文章一定会对司法实践有所裨益。 The judicial protection of intellectual property has been generally valued by people’s courts at all levels in our country and accumulated valuable experience. However, in its development and practice, it faces bottlenecks and difficulties in development and restricts the full play of its functions. In particular, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee has taken the promotion of the state legal system and the modernization of the rule of law as the overall goal of deepening the overall reform and has given social governance a higher level and a brand new historical picture. Selected publications from a number of articles in five articles, compiled topics, with a view to China’s judicial protection of intellectual property evolution and improve the contribution of modest. The article includes: the development of the video game industry has changed the public entertainment lifestyle, but also brought endless legal issues, free riding, malicious imitation and other cottage phenomenon violated the legitimate interests of the relevant rights subject, undermining the fair, Reasonable competition in the market order. For the Apple company in the promotion of Apple mobile phone follow-up software bundled user spending channels, in order to derive more business interests of the marketing model, users and distributors of Apple’s mobile phone “Prison Break ” infringement of Apple’s copyright technology protection The measures have been explained by jurisprudence, which has a higher reference value for the judges in the trial courts of intellectual property to judge similar cases. “Trap Evidence ” is still a brand new concept in civil procedural law. It is controversial whether the infringer can obtain the evidence in this way and whether the evidence obtained can be used in the trial. The consummation and standardization “Trap evidence” mode, prompting “Trap evidence ” became the weapon of the infringer to protect their legitimate rights and interests, can make up for the infringement of “innate ” weak position in the software intellectual property infringement cases. In addition, in the intellectual property infringement litigation, the determination of the amount of damages has not yet formed a complete and effective solution designed for its particularity, which urgently needs to be improved from the litigation evidence system. As a way for the people’s courts to deeply participate in social governance, the “White Paper” has its unique and irreplaceable role in helping people to deeply reflect on the common loopholes, problems and shortcomings in the judicial protection of intellectual property. I believe these articles will certainly benefit the judicial practice.