早期美国“公益辩护活动”有两种活动模式 :谋求组织化改革的模式与以日常业务为基盘开展的公益辩护的模式。在保护“公益”这个新兴利益时 ,作为巨大的法律机器与一般普通市民的具体问题间的媒介律师发挥了巨大作用。对比研究美国律师“公益辩护活动模式”与我国公益辩护活动 ,对于正确评价我国司法体制是否真正具有维护“公益”能力机制大有裨益 Early American “public defense activities” have two modes of activity: the mode of organizing reform and the mode of public-benefit defense based on daily operations. In protecting the emerging interests of “public interest,” media lawyers, acting as a huge legal machine and among ordinary citizens, have played a significant role. A Comparative Study of American Lawyers “Public Defender Activities Model” and China’s Public Defensive Activities Are Great for Evaluating Whether Our Judicial System Has a Real Capacity to Maintain “Public Interests”