论文部分内容阅读
柏(柏拉图):我有几个问题,想请你做进一步的说明。第一个问题:在我所了解的一些被认为是唯物史观的美学论著中,其作者们都很少使用“人性”这个概念。但在你今天所谈的对唯物史观的理解中,“人性”却成了一个具有核心意义的概念。你怎样解释这个现象?杜(杜键):人,当然有“人性”。整个历史唯物主义,其实就是一门关于人是什么、他如何发展的学问;也可以说它就是一门关于“人性”的学说。正如您所看到的,过去一些(当然不是所有)主张唯物史观的美学论文,不常用“人性”这个词,这主要是因为“人性”这
Parker (Plato): I have a few questions and would like to ask you for further clarification. The first question: In my understanding of some of the aesthetic treatises considered as historical materialism, the authors seldom use the notion of “human nature.” However, in your understanding of the historical materialism discussed today, “human nature” has become a core concept. How do you explain this phenomenon? Du (Du key): people, of course, “human nature ”. The entire historical materialism is actually a study of what man is and how he develops. It can also be said that it is a doctrine of “human nature ”. As you can see, the past, if not all, of the aesthetical essays advocating materialist conception of history do not often use the word “human nature,” mainly because of “human nature”